Guidance on performing a systematic review from the CRD (Centre for Reviews and Dissemination)
A Guide to Conducting Systematic Reviews: Steps in a Systematic Review
Where to search for Clinical trials: Medline, Embase, Cochrane, Web of Science, Scopus (EMBASE 90), Science Direct, CINAHL , Clinical trials registers, Grey Literature, Subject Specific Databases
How to report a study: PRISMA, EQUATOR, CONSORT
How to access a study: GRADE, Newcastle-Ottowa, JADAD
A systematic review attempts to collate all empirical evidence that fits pre-specified eligibility criteria in order to answer a specific research question. It uses explicit, systematic methods that are selected with a view to minimizing bias, thus providing more reliable findings from which conclusions can be drawn and decisions made. The key characteristics of a systematic review are:
(Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions, 2011)
A systematic review is an overview of primary studies that used explicit and reproducible methods
A meta-analysis is a mathematical synthesis of the results of two or more primary studies that addressed the same hypothesis in the same way
Although meta-analysis can increase the precision of a result, it is important to ensure that the methods used for the review were valid and reliable
In contrast, a systematic review is an overview of primary studies which contains an explicit statement of objectives, materials, and methods and has been conducted according to explicit and reproducible methodology