Subject & Study Guides: Systematic Reviews: Reporting and Dissemination

Synthesis

Article: The methodological and reporting characteristics of Campbell reviews: A systematic review The methodological and reporting characteristics of Campbell reviews: A systematic review Xiaoqin Wang, Vivian Welch, Meixuan Li, Liang Yao, Julia Littell, Huijuan Li, Nan Yang, Jianjian Wang, Larissa Shamseer, Yaolong Chen, Kehu Yang, Jeremy M. Grimshaw First published: 07 February 2021 https://doi.org/10.1002/cl2.1134Citations: 1 Abstract Background The Campbell Collaboration undertakes systematic reviews of the effects of social and economic policies (interventions) to help policymakers, practitioners, and the public to make well-informed decisions about policy interventions. In 2010, the Cochrane Collaboration and the Campbell Collaboration developed a voluntary co-registration policy under the rationale to make full use of the shared interests and diverse expertise from different review groups within these two organizations. In order to promote the methodological quality and transparency of Campbell intervention reviews, the Methodological Expectations of Campbell Collaboration Intervention Reviews (MECCIR) were introduced in 2014 to guide Campbell reviewers. However, there has not been a comprehensive review of the methodological quality and reporting characteristics of Campbell reviews.
Article: Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement
CONSORT reporting for Randomized Trials The main product of CONSORT is the CONSORT Statement, which is an evidence-based, minimum set of recommendations for reporting randomized trials. It offers a standard way for authors to prepare reports of trial findings, facilitating their complete and transparent reporting, and aiding their critical appraisal and interpretation.
EQUATOR Network reporting guidelines for main study types The EQUATOR (Enhancing the QUAlity and Transparency Of health Research) Network is an international initiative that seeks to improve the reliability and value of published health research literature by promoting transparent and accurate reporting and wider use of robust reporting guidelines. They provide a list of various standards for reporting in systematic reviews.
PRISMA 2020 CHECKLIST

Consort Reporting Checklist
Methodological expectations of Campbell Collaboration intervention reviews: Reporting standards The MECCIR guides the conduct and reporting of systematic reviews. Although the list of requirements may seem quite long, they are the building blocks of a high quality systematic review or EGM, and most of the items are straightforward to implement.

Note: Taken from: 'CRD's guidance for undertaking reviews in Healthcare' p.78

Taken from 'CRD's guidance for undertaking reviews in Healthcare' p.81

Taken from 'CRD's guidance for undertaking reviews in Healthcare' p. 90

Some Options for Dissemination:

Journal: Paper / News Item/ Letter

Conference: Presentation or Poster

Report

Lay Press

Social Media/ Internet

Set up Event/ Conference / Seminar

Scholarly Channels / Networks